Tuesday, November 28, 2006

The Dantonio Regime Begins: An Overview of Spartan Football

Mark Dantonio was announced as the 24th head coach of the Michigan State University football program yesterday. Finally, Michigan State has hired the right coach. Dantonio has worked at State and understands the inane politics behind the university athletic director and board of trustees. More importantly, he also has collegiate head coaching experience in a BCS conference (all be it a weak BCS conference).

Dantonio was an assistant under Nick Saban from 1995-2000 and was the defensive back’s coach. He then was promoted to associate head coach under Bobby Williams in 2001. In 2002 he left for the Ohio State University where he helped orchestrate a National Championship. He left the Buckeyes in 2003 when he was hired as the head coach at Cincinnati.

This year at Cincinnati he led a youthful team to a 7-5 record, with four of those losses coming to West Virginia, Virginia Tech, Louisville and the Ohio State. Those teams have a combined record of 41 wins, 5 losses. Dantonio led the upset over then number six Rutgers in a 30-11 romp as well as a 23-6 stomping of an under-rated 8-4 South Florida. South Florida just beat West Virginia in Morgantown this past weekend.

I received a voicemail from someone who was very close to the Michigan State football program in the mid to late nineties and here’s what he said, “If it’s the Dantonio that was there under Saban, then he was the defensive backs coach with the safeties and cornerbacks. He’s a douche bag. We’re in for a long three to four years.”

I don’t hold the same pessimism. Dantonio is a defensive minded coach who fits into a similar mold of his mentors, Nick Saban and Jim Tressel. Michigan State has the talent to go to a bowl game every year, but is not quite at the level to compete for Big Ten Championships. As a head coach, Dantonio can get the Spartans to that next level, but here’s what he needs to do.

Recruiting
Hit the trail hard and keep the current recruits. John L. Smith’s staff did a great job assembling a solid recruiting class for 2007. In order to keep some of these recruits Dantonio needs to keep some of John L.’s coaches, namely quarterbacks coach, Dan Enos, and strength and conditioning coach, Jeff Stoutland. Keith Nichol, an Elite Eleven quarterback, committed to Michigan State in the summer of 2005. He is a dual threat quarterback and loved the spread offense John L. employed. He also had a very close relationship with Enos. If Enos isn’t hired, expect Nichol to jump ship and head to Oklahoma. Jack Cornell Jr., a highly rated offensive lineman out of Ohio, is on the verge of decommitting from State and committing to Nebraska. Jeff Stoutland was Cornell’s primary recruiter. Dantonio must keep these two coaches to maintain the strength of this class. He needs to bolster the secondary, particularly the corner position, as well as the defensive line. On offense he must rebuild the depth at running back. Michigan State has the facilities and intangibles to sign top recruits and Dantonio should plan on going after the top recruits in the mid-west.

Offense
If Nichol signs with State, the quarterback position is in good shape for quite some time. Michigan State has a talented corps of wide receivers and the offensive line is a big strength, especially if the current class of 2007 all sign. The running back position is thin. There is talent, but not a lot of depth. Dantonio should talk to his mentor Tressel about running a similar spread offense. Tressel’s offense has been nearly impossible to slow down this year and although Michigan State does not have a Troy Smith quarterback, the receivers are comparable…if properly coached. Dantonio has stated he would like to run the ball because it shows toughness, but currently State is built for a spread and that must be utilized to be successful.

Defense
Dantonio knows defense. Think back to the late nineties and the durable DB’s State had: Reynaldo Hill, Amp Campbell, Sori Kanu and Aric Morris. The strong safety position was always strength for Michigan State and just last year Dantonio’s last State recruit, Eric Smith, graduated after a solid career as a Spartan. Dantonio won’t run the stupid and ineffective 4-2-5-shell defense. He should consider running a 3-4 defense with “tweeners” like Brandon Long and Ervin, G-Ball, Baldwin. Baldwin is a little larger and is better as a down lineman, but he is athletic enough to drop in coverage in zone blitzes. Long is 6’4’’ and has put on significant weight since entering college. He can play as an outside linebacker or rush end. A 3-4 offers the diversity to run complex blitz packages as well as stuff eight guys in the box to slow the run. Dantonio should also take advantage of the athleticism of SirDarrean Adams and Otis Wiley. Nehemiah Warrick and Travis Key are play-making safeties and a healthy Ross Weaver will and Dantnio’s expertise in the defensive backfield will eliminate many of the blown coverages seen over the last three years. The players are there and it will be interesting to see if Dantonio puts them in position to make plays.

Special Teams
The Spartans lose a Big Ten first team punter in Brandon Fields, but place-kicker Brett Swenson will return after an outstanding freshman year. Michigan State has always been able to play well in the special teams department and Dantonio does not need to do a whole lot to maintain solid special teams play. Javon Ringer, if healthy, is a speedster who is dangerous as a returner. Dantonio could also turn to David Williams, a red shirt freshman, for kick returning duties.

There is a lot of work to be done, but recruiting is the biggest aspect right now. Michigan State has the players, facilities and now the personnel to be successful next year and if Dantonio can have a couple of winning seasons and land some blue-chip recruits the Spartans will be able to contend for a Big Ten title in the near future. That is of course if he doesn't wear a sweater vest.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Firstly, if he runs a 3-4 he has to make sure to blitz on damn near every down. You can't win in the Big Ten if you don't put pressure on the quarterback. Even the perenially crappy schools have talented QBs who have a chance against a zone when only rushed by 3 down linemen.

Secondly, perhaps your unnamed voice mailer is still a little bitter about not earning playing time in the secondary and holds a grudge against his former coach. Maybe not, but that's sure how it sounds. Describing Dantonio as a douche bag with no surrounding evidence certainly doesn't work in the accusers favor.

Anonymous said...

ah yes. the accuser in question was actually a wide receiver. from what i gather from talking to him in general is the entire team wasn't friendly with the coaches, save bobby williams. dantonio was kind of like saban and yelled a lot and made players feel stupid. i don't think the accuser is right about dantonio, but he was on a team that dantonio was on the coaching staff. douche bag or not, he did have good defenses while at state.

as for the defense. blitzing is imperative. i would do it every down. from what i gather good things happen when you put pressure on a quarterback. i'm not suggesting running zone coverages all the time, but with a 34 d you can bring pressure from different areas...especially with athletic ends like a lamar woodley. state doesn't have that talent, but i love the way ron english used him this year. you're right, you can't play zone and only rush three, but i think zone blitzes really mess with quarterbacks. if they can fuck peyton manning up that much, then i'm sure someone like brian cupito or drew tate would be confused. basically, i really should say use state's athleticism defensively with different schemes and for the love of god bring blitz packages that actually get to the quarterback.

you are smart.

Anonymous said...

a) I'm not all that smart.

b) I wasn't accusing your desire for a 3-4, just saying that they better blitz a lot.

c) Sorry about the accuser's misunderstood position.

d) Nobody likes coaches that yell a lot and are strict, but they make good programs. I think that you can only be so likable and successful at the same time. The only example that I can think of of a coach that everyone seems to like and wins a lot is Pete Carrol. But it's not a popularity contest, it's about respect. You can't worry about whether or not the kids like you too much. If you do your job and they do theirs then you'll have their respect. If you do your job and they don't do theirs or are detrimental to the team chemistry then they need to go.

e) Bobby Williams sucked as a head coach because he was "friendly" with the players. It's kind of acceptable for an assistant coach to be friendly with players, but as a head coach you have to earn their respect and keep your distance from a friendly relationship. Not saying that you have to be a dick, but you have to be the leader and not an equal. It's like NCOs versus COs in the military.

f) "douche bag" is a funny term

Anonymous said...

1) you are smart

2) i should have been more clear - blitz the shit out of everyone all the time. it works in playstation, right?

3) higgins is easy to misunderstand...oops i gave away my source. is that unethical emily?

4) scotty bowman was a huge dick. and the best coach ever in hockey. larry brown was a cock. good coach. in the college ranks i think of tom izzo. mean as hell, pretty good coach. then i think of coach k and he is well liked and a great coach. but i agree, you gotta kinda be a dick to be a good coach.

5) bobby williams was an awful head coach confounded by the fact that he was black. john l. was basically in the same boat as bobby and bobby was fired on the spot, john l. got to hang around and then was asked to just finish the season. i would like to have seen bobby do well, but he just didn't get it.

6) douche bag is a great term. i like bagadouche myself. bagabond of douche. simply douche. douche fuck. they're all great.

7) our interactions here have been very long.

JC said...

a). you are a lot smarter than me.

b). spot on with the 3-4. It can be very effective, but unless you have the best three linemen in the universe (which State doesn't), you need creatie blitz packages to pressure the QB. If you don't pressure the QB, the secondary is hung out to dry.

c). The accuser is kind of spastic, I know this for a fact. He may be over-dramaticising (eff spelling) the situation. Good insider track though AZ. Next time you talk to you insider, tell him I thoroughly enjoy doing his sister.

d) & e). Eventually no one cares whether you are a dick at practice and unapproachable on or away from the sidelines as a coach. That is if you are winning. Things will fall into place and a rapport will be established.....after the coach lays down the law. Haven't we all seen the football movies where the coaches nearly kill their players in practice only to form a core and a winning team.

f). It is one of my favourites. (Ooh, the Canadian flare)

JC said...

Since you posted as I was writing, I didn't notice that you gave away your source. Maybe I should have the conclusion of point c stricken from the record.

yes, long indeed. JC likey likey

Anonymous said...

it's not unethical unless he specifically asked you not to mention his name. seeing as higgins probably doesn't read this blog, and therefore didn't know you would be posting his comments, i'd say you are ok.

the big ten is getting killed in the challenge. go state (tomorrow)!!!

Anonymous said...

don't they always get killed in the Challenge?

i almost wish DJ were here to defend the penis with the vests (that applied more to the last Dantonio blog, but still could apply here).

Anonymous said...

it does apply here. i mentioned the vest, in so far as if dantonio wears one, state will not be succesfull. you're right on.

is it unethical to call a source a douche bag?

JC said...

Is it ethical to enjoy doing a source's sister? Sorry Higgens.

Anonymous said...

not if she's hot.

Anonymous said...

true